|
Ackrill, J.L. (1963) Aristotle: Categories and De Interpretatione, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Defence of the ‘questions’ approach to Aristotle’s categories.) |
|
Baumer, M. (1993) ‘Chasing Aristotle’s Categories Down the Tree of Grammar’, Journal of Philosophical Research
18: 341–449. (Defence of the ‘grammar’ approach to Aristotle’s categories.). |
|
Carnap, R. (1931) ‘Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache’, Erkenntnis
2(1), 219–241; trans., ‘The Elimination of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language’, in H.
Adams and L.
Searle (eds) Critical Theory since Plato, Boston: Thomson, 2005, 980–989. (Carnap’s explanation of how to dispel illusory problems of metaphysics through the analysis of language.) |
|
Copi, I. (1971) The Theory of Logical Types, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (A concise introduction to the theory of types and the paradoxes that motivate it, for the general reader.) |
|
Ganeri, J. (2001) Philosophy in Classical India, London: Routledge. (Chapter 3 provides a clear account of the Vaiśeṣika system of categories.) |
|
Guarino, N. (2005) ‘Ontologies and Knowledge Bases: Towards a Terminological Clarification’, in N.J.I.
Mars (ed.) Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases, Amsterdam: IOS Press, 25–32. (On the use of systems of ontological categories in artificial intelligence.) |
|
Halbfass, W. (1992) On Being and What There Is: Classical Vaiśeṣika and the History of Indian Ontology, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. (Contains another good discussion of the Vaiśeṣika system of ontological categories.) |
|
Isaacson, H. (1993) ‘Yogic Perception (yogipratyakṣa) in Early Vaiśeṣika’, Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik
18: 139–160. (On the Vaiśeṣika idea that meditatively trained perception can directly access the ontological categories.) |
|
Katz, J.J. (1966) The Philosophy of Language, New York: Harper & Row. (An account of ontological categories in terms of a contemporary take on conceptual containment.) |
|
Lakoff, G. (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (On psychological foundations of ontological distinctions.) |
|
Longuenesse, B. (1998) ‘The Divisions of the Transcendental Logic and the Leading Thread’, in G.
Mohr and M.
Willascheck (eds) Immanuel Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. (On Kant’s theory of categories in the context of the Critique of Pure Reason.) |
|
Lowe, E.J. (2001) The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity and Time, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (A survey of metaphysics by one of the most important contemporary metaphysicians.) |
|
Munn, K. and Smith, B. (eds) (2008) Applied Ontology: An Introduction, New York: Walter de Gruyter. (Discusses the role philosophical work on ontological categories can play in designing ontologies for information systems and knowledge representation.) |
|
Wardy, R. (2000) Aristotle in China: Language, Categories, and Translation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Discussion of the idea of the language-relative nature of systems of ontological categories, includes some discussion of the Sapir-Whorf thesis.) |
|
Westerhoff, J. (2005) Ontological Categories: Their Nature and Significance, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Develops a relativistic account of ontological categories.) |