|
Dalgarno, M. (1984) ‘Reid’s Natural Jurisprudence: The Language of Rights and Duties’, in V.
Hope (ed.) Philosophers of the Scottish Enlightenment, Edinburgh, 13–31. (A clear and helpful introductory paper, discussed in 6.) |
|
Dalgarno, M. and Matthews, E. (1989) The Philosophy of Thomas Reid, Dordrecht, Boston, MA and London: Kluwer. (Contains useful papers on perception, sensation, common sense, mind and action, aesthetics, moral and political obligation, as well as material on the historical context and a helpful bibliography. Invaluable for the serious intending student.) |
|
Daniels, N. (1974) Thomas Reid’s Inquiry: The Geometry of Visibles and the Case for Realism, New York: Franklin. (A simple exposition of Reid’s non-euclidean geometry of visibles.) |
|
Ferreira, M.J. (1986) Scepticism and Reasonable Doubt, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Ably expounds and discusses Reid on first principles and probable reasoning.) |
|
Gallie, R.D. (1989) Thomas Reid and ‘The Way of Ideas’, Dordrecht, Boston, MA and London: Kluwer. (Contains useful discussions of perception, conception, signification, active power, continuity and the self, and first principles.) |
|
Gracyk, T. (1987) ‘The Failure of Thomas Reid’s Aesthetics’, Monist
70 (4): 465–482. (A stimulating paper on this subject discussed in 4 and 5. There are other interesting papers on Reid in the same number.) |
|
Haldane, J. (1993) ‘Whose Theory? Which Representations?’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly
74 (3): 247–257. (Further valuable discussion on Reid and modern representationalism in response to Stecker (1992).) |
|
Kivy, P. (1973) Thomas Reid’s Lectures on the Fine Arts, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. (Although the lecture notes on which the text is based are not in Reid’s hand the text is an invaluable source for the serious student of Reid’s aesthetics.) |
|
Lehrer, K. (1989) Thomas Reid, London and New York: Routledge. (Ingeniously applies a computational mind model approach to Reid in order to illuminate important areas of Reid’s thought-perception, memory and conception, first principles and morality. Contains useful bibliographical information. A stimulating analytical introduction to much of Reid’s philosophy suitable for advanced undergraduate students and beyond.) |
|
Stecker, R. (1992) ‘Thomas Reid’s Philosophy of Action’, Philosophical Studies
66 (2): 197–208. (Able discussion of whether Reid’s insights into decision and action require a libertarian framework.) |
|
Stecker, R. (1992) ‘Does Reid Reject/Refute the Representational Theory of Mind?’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly
73 (2): 174–184. (Argues clearly that Lehrer’s contention that there are sufficient materials in Reid to refute modern representationalism is not well founded.) |
|
Rowe, W.L. (1991) Thomas Reid on Freedom and Morality, Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press. (Clear and thorough exposition and discussion of Reid, as well as of Locke, Collins and Clarke, in the areas of decision, free action, causation and motivation.) |
|
Schulthess, D. (1983) Philosophie et Sens Commun chez Thomas Reid, Berne: Lang. (A clear and readable exposition of nearly all aspects of Reid’s philosophy.) |