Version: v1, Published online: 1998
Retrieved March 29, 2024, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/overview/tibetan-philosophy/v-1
References and further reading
Cabezón, J. (1994) Buddhism and Language: A Study of Indo-Tibetan Scholasticism, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
dPa’ bo gtsug lag phreng ba (16th century) mKhas pa’i dga’ ston (Feast for Scholars), ed. rDo rje rGyal po, Beijing: Minzu chubanshe, 1986.
Dreyfus, G. (1997) Recognizing Reality. Dharmakīrti’s Philosophy and its Tibetan Interpretations, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
gNubs chen Sangs rgyas ye shes (10th century) bSam gtan mig sgron (Lamp for the Eye of Meditative Absorption), Smanrtsis Sherig Spendzod Series 74, Leh, India: N. Topgyal, 1974.
Gomez, L.O. (1983) ‘Indian Materials on the Doctrine of Sudden Enlightenment’, in W. Lai and L.R. Lancaster (eds) Early Ch’an in China and Tibet, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 393–434.
Jackson, D.P. (1987) The Entrance Gate for the Wise, Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien.
(Detailed information on Sa skya Paṇḍita and his tradition.)
Jackson, D.P. (1994) Enlightenment by a Single Means: Tibetan Controversies on The ‘Self-Sufficient White Remedy’ (dkar po chig thub), Vienna: Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Karmay, Samten Gyaltsen (1988) The Great Perfection: A Philosophical and Meditative Training of Tibetan Buddhism, Leiden: Brill.
Kuijp, L. van der (1983) Contributions to the Development of Tibetan Buddhist Epistemology from the Eleventh to the Thirteenth Century, Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.
Matsumoto, S. (1990) ‘The Mādhyamika Philosophy of Tsong kha pa’, Memoirs of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko 48: 17–47.
(A vigorous argument for the importance and uniqueness of Tsong kha pa in Indo-Tibetan Mādhyamika thought.)
Mimaki, K. (1982) Blo gsal grub mtha’: Chapitres IX (Vaibhāṣika) et XI (Yogācāra) édités et Chapitre XII (Mādhyamika) édité et traduit, Kyoto: Zinbun Kagaku Kenkyusyo.
Onoda, S. (1992) Monastic Debate in Tibet: A Study on the History and Structures of bsDus grwa logic, Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien.
Ruegg, D. Seyfort (1963) ‘The Jo naṅ pas: A School of Buddhist Ontologists according to the Grub mtha’ śel gyi me loṅ’, Journal of the American Oriental Society 83: 73–91.
Ruegg, D. Seyfort (1992) Buddha-nature, Mind and the Problem of Gradualism in a Comparative Perspective: On the Transmission and Reception of Buddhism in India and Tibet, London: School of Oriental and African Studies.
Sa skya Paṇḍita Kun dga’ rgyal mtshan (1182–1251) Rigs gter (Treasure of Reasoning), in Sa skya pa’i bKa’ ’bum, The Complete Works of the Great Masters of the Sa skya Sect of Tibetan Buddhism, compiled by bSod nams rgya mtsho, vol. 5, Tokyo: The Toyo Bunko, 1968.
Tillemans, T. (1989) ‘Formal and Semantic Aspects of Tibetan Buddhist Debate Logic’, Journal of Indian Philosophy 17: 265–297.
Tillemans, T. (1990) ‘On Sapakṣa’, Journal of Indian Philosophy 18: 53–79.
Tillemans, T. (1995) ‘On the So-called Difficult Point of the Apoha Theory’, Asiatische Studien–Études Asiatiques 49 (4): 853–889.
Tucci, G. (1980) The Religions of Tibet, trans. G. Samuel, London: Routledge.
Williams, P. (1992) ‘Non-Conceptuality, Critical Reasoning and Religious Experience: Some Tibetan Buddhist Discussions’, in M. McGhee (ed.) Philosophy, Religion, and the Spiritual Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 189–210.
Yoshimizu, C. (1993) ‘The Madhyamaka Theories Regarded as False by the Dge lugs pas’, Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens 37: 201–227.
Tillemans, Tom J.F.. Bibliography. Tibetan philosophy, 1998, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-F003-1. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/overview/tibetan-philosophy/v-1/bibliography/tibetan-philosophy-bib.
Copyright © 1998-2024 Routledge.