Access to the full content is only available to members of institutions that have purchased access. If you belong to such an institution, please log in or find out more about how to order.


Print
REVISED
|

A posteriori

DOI
10.4324/9780415249126-P002-2
Versions
Published
2011
DOI: 10.4324/9780415249126-P002-2
Version: v2,  Published online: 2011
Retrieved December 07, 2019, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/a-posteriori/v-2

Article Summary

A prominent term in theory of knowledge since the seventeenth century, ‘a posteriori’ signifies a kind of knowledge or justification that depends on evidence, or justification, from sensory experience. A posteriori truth is truth that cannot be known or justified independently of evidence from sensory experience, and a posteriori concepts are concepts that cannot be understood independently of reference to sensory experience. A posteriori knowledge contrasts with a priori knowledge, knowledge that does not require evidence from sensory experience. A posteriori knowledge is empirical, experience-based knowledge, whereas a priori knowledge is nonempirical knowledge. Standard examples of a posteriori truths are the truths of ordinary perceptual experience and the natural sciences; standard examples of a priori truths are the truths of logic and mathematics. The common understanding of the distinction between a posteriori and a priori knowledge as the distinction between empirical and nonempirical knowledge comes from Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason 1781/1787.

Print
Citing this article:
Moser, Paul K.. A posteriori, 2011, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-P002-2. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/a-posteriori/v-2.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Routledge.

Related Searches

Topics

Related Articles