Access to the full content is only available to members of institutions that have purchased access. If you belong to such an institution, please log in or find out more about how to order.


Print
REVISED
|

Art, abstract

DOI
10.4324/9780415249126-M001-3
Versions
Published
2021
DOI: 10.4324/9780415249126-M001-3
Version: v3,  Published online: 2021
Retrieved December 09, 2021, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/art-abstract/v-3

Article Summary

Article Summary

Given the detailed coverage of the varieties of abstract art in the 1998 article (hereafter ‘Abstract1998’), what further points and observations are now needed? Here are four. (1) Yet deeper knowledge of illegitimate bias and misunderstanding of disfavoured art forms worldwide, both in the past and now, that affect both the foundational concept of non-abstract verisimilitude and its polar opposite, abstract art. (2) Broader survey of factors driving the creation of forms of abstraction and their appreciation. Why are some now so well appreciated after such long dismissal? (3) Diagnosis of forms of connection between abstract and non-abstract art that justify regarding them as belonging to the omnivorous category of art. (4) Reflections on deep limits of our understanding of artistic conceptions reaching beyond all current ideas.

Each part of this revision can consider only a sampling of a stupendously diverse situation which continues to evolve at a rapid pace.

Print
Citing this article:
Brown, John H.. Art, abstract, 2021, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-M001-3. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/art-abstract/v-3.
Copyright © 1998-2021 Routledge.

Related Articles