The access management system was updated on 31st March. If you experience any difficulty logging in, please try resetting your password. If the issue persists, please contact support at [email protected]
Cousin, V. (1828) Cours de l’histoire de la philosophie moderne, Paris: Pichon & Didier, 3 vols; trans. O.W. Wight Course of the History of Modern Philosophy, New York: Appleton 1852. (Cousin’s use of the word ‘absolute’ has misled numerous commentators into characterizing him as an absolute idealist.) | |
Cousin, V. (1853) Du vrai, du beau, du bien, Paris: Didier; trans. O.W. Wight The True, the Beautiful and the Good, New York: Appleton, 1854. (Shortened version of Cousin’s lectures and a nineteenth-century translation of the 3rd edition.) | |
Jouffroy, T. (1838) Philosophical Miscellanies, Boston, MA: Hilliard, Gray. | |
Jouffroy, T. (1840) Introduction to Ethics, Including a Critical Survey of Moral Systems, trans. W.H. Channing, Boston, MA: Hilliard, Gray. (This book was a standard text for ethics courses in American universities during the long dominance of Reid’s philosophy in America.) | |
Mahan, A. (1881) A Critical History of Philosophy, London: Elliot Stock. | |
McCosh, J. (1867) Intuitions of the Mind, revised edn, New York: Carter. | |
Reid, T. (1785) Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man, ed. B. Brody, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1969. (The best edition since it avoids all of Hamilton’s footnotes which are systematically misleading.) | |
Reid, T. (1788) Essays on the Active Powers of the Human Mind, ed. B. Brody, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1969. (The best edition since it avoids all of Hamilton’s footnotes which are systematically misleading.) | |
Reid, T. (1872) Collected Works, ed. W. Hamilton, Edinburgh: Maclachlan & Stewart, 7th edn. (Hamilton’s footnotes are systematically misleading.) | |
Stewart, D. (1826) Esquisses de philosophie morale (Outline of moral philosophy), trans. T. Jouffroy, Paris: Johanneau. | |
Stewart, D. (1854–60) Collected Works, ed. W. Hamilton, Edinburgh: Constable. (Text is good, but the footnotes should be avoided. Strangely, Hamilton never had a clear understanding of the common sense tradition.) | |
Wayland, F. (1835) The Elements of Moral Science, ed. J.L. Blau, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963. |
Barker, S.F. and Beauchamp, T.C. (1976) Thomas Reid: Critical Interpretations, Philadelphia, PA: Monograph Series. (Analyses and clarifies numerous aspects of Reid’s philosophy.) | |
Grave, S.A. (1960) The Scottish Philosophy of Common Sense, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Presents a flawed interpretation of Reid’s views on sensation and perception, but helpfully promoted the resurgence of the new interest in the Common Sense School.) | |
Lehrer, Keith (1989) Thomas Reid, London: Routledge. (Claims Reid’s major contribution is his combining nativism, psychology and epistemology.) | |
Madden, E.H. (1968) Civil Disobedience and Moral Law, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. | |
Madden, E.H. (1986) ‘Stewart’s Enrichment of the Common Sense Tradition’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 3 (1): 45–63. | |
Manns, J.W. (1993) Reid and his French Disciples, Leyden: Brill. | |
Rowe, W.L. (1991) Thomas Reid on Freedom and Morality, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Constitutes the most thorough examination of Reid’s agency theory.) | |
Stewart, D. (1803) Account of the Life and Writings of Thomas Reid, Edinburgh, William Creech. |