|
Barber, B. (1984) Strong Democracy, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. |
|
Copp, D., Hampton, J. and Roemer, J.E. (1993) The Idea of Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Full collection of studies on truth, antecedent preferences and publicity.) |
|
Dahl, R.A. (1989) Democracy and its Critics, New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press. (Presentation of criticisms and reply; useful on equality.) |
|
Elster, J. (1986) ‘The Market and the Forum’, in J.
Elster and A.
Hylland (eds) Foundations of Social Choice Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
|
Estlund, D. (1989) ‘The Puzzle of the Minority Democrat’, American Philosophical Quarterly 26: 143–51. (Contains an account and full bibliography of the paradox of democracy.) |
|
Gallie, W.B. (1956) ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–98. |
|
Graham, K. (1986) The Battle of Democracy, Brighton: Wheatsheaf. (Analyses democracy in terms of various normative grounds; good defence in terms of autonomy and also useful on Marxist theories.) |
|
Harrison, R. (1993) Democracy, London: Routledge. (Historical account and analysis of value in terms of such values as equality, knowledge and autonomy.) |
|
Madison, J., Hamilton, A. and Jay, J. (1787–8) The Federalist Papers, ed. I.
Kramnick, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987. (Paper number ten, written by Madison, is quoted in §1.) |
|
Mill, J. (1820) Government, reprinted in J.
Lively and J.
Rees (eds) Utilitarian Logic and Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978. |
|
Mill, J.S. (1859) On Liberty, in Utilitarianism/On Liberty/Considerations on Representative Government, London: Dent, 1910. (Chapter 1 refers to the ‘tyranny of the majority’, mentioned in §2.) |
|
Mill, J.S. (1861) Considerations on Representative Government, in Utilitarianism/On Liberty/Considerations on Representative Government, London: Dent, 1910. |
|
Montesquieu, C.L. de S. (1748) De l’esprit des lois (The Spirit of the Laws), trans. A.
Cohler
, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. (The statement about size, referred to in §1, is in Book 8, chapter 16.) |
|
Nelson, W.N. (1980) On Justifying Democracy, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Mentioned in §6; criticizes various supposed bases.) |
|
Phillips, A. (1991) Engendering Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press. (Feminist analysis and critique of democracy.) |
|
Plato (c.
380–367) The Republic, trans. with introduction and notes by F.M.
Cornford, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1941. |
|
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Section 23 is on publicity; sections 53 and 54 are on majority rule; the proposal to pay political parties, mentioned in §6, occurs on page 226.) |
|
Rousseau, J.-J. (1762) Du contrat social, ed. and trans. G.D.H. Cole in The Social Contract and Discourses, London: Dent, 1973. (That states should be small and fortunes equal as preconditions for democracy is claimed in Book 3, chapter 4; however, it is the first two books which have been most influential, particularly about the general will.) |
|
Riker, W.H. (1982) Liberalism against Populism, San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman. |
|
Schumpeter, J.A. (1943) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, London: Allen & Unwin. (Part IV criticizes the classical account of democracy and proposes instead that democracy should be seen as the competition between various elites bidding for votes.) |
|
Singer, P. (1973) Democracy and Disobedience, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Argues that participation in a democratic procedure places the participants under an obligation to accept its results.) |
|
Tocqueville, A. de (1835) De la democratie en Amerique (Democracy in America), ed. J.P.
Mayer and M.
Lerner, London: Fontana, 1966. (Part I, chapter 15, is the section on the ‘tyranny of the majority’, referred to in §2.) |
|
Wollheim, R. (1962) ‘A Paradox in the Theory of Democracy’, in P.
Laslett and W.G.
Runciman (eds) Philosophy, Politics and Society, 2nd series, Oxford: Blackwell. (The article referred to in §3.) |