Access to the full content is only available to members of institutions that have purchased access. If you belong to such an institution, please log in or find out more about how to order.


Print

Double effect, principle of

DOI
10.4324/9780415249126-L017-1
DOI: 10.4324/9780415249126-L017-1
Version: v1,  Published online: 1998
Retrieved March 24, 2019, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/double-effect-principle-of/v-1

Article Summary

‘Double effect’ refers to the good and bad effects which may foreseeably follow from one and the same act. The principle of double effect originates in Aquinas’ ethics, and is supposed to guide decision about acts with double effect where the bad effect is something that must not be intended, such as the death of an innocent person. The principle permits such acts only if the bad effect is unintended, not disproportionate to the intended good effect, and unavoidable if the good effect is to be achieved. The principle has wide relevance in the moral evaluation of acts which have foreseen double effects. Controversy arises over the identification of the agent’s intention in difficult cases, and over the use of the principle to resolve issues such as abortion, euthanasia, the use of pain-relieving drugs which hasten death, self-defence, and the killing of certain sorts of non-combatants in war.

Print
Citing this article:
Uniacke, Suzanne. Double effect, principle of, 1998, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-L017-1. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/double-effect-principle-of/v-1.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Routledge.

Related Searches

Topics

Related Articles