Access to the full content is only available to members of institutions that have purchased access. If you belong to such an institution, please log in or find out more about how to order.


Print

Contents

Federalism and confederalism

DOI
10.4324/9780415249126-S024-1
DOI: 10.4324/9780415249126-S024-1
Version: v1,  Published online: 1998
Retrieved March 27, 2019, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/federalism-and-confederalism/v-1

Article Summary

Federative arrangements involve two or more governments ruling over the same territory and population. They have been of interest to political philosophers because they challenge, or at least complicate, some fundamental political concepts like authority, sovereignty, democracy and citizenship. Like citizens in actual federations, philosophers do not treat the terms of federation as a merely technocratic matter: they believe that there are morally legitimate and illegitimate ways of, among other things, dividing powers between governments, determining the representation of the subunits (for example, provinces) within federal institutions and amending the constitution. Philosophers also see in federalism a means of securing a degree of self-determination for ethnic minorities who cannot realistically expect to have their own homogeneous nation-states.

Print
Citing this article:
Norman, Wayne. Federalism and confederalism, 1998, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-S024-1. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/federalism-and-confederalism/v-1.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Routledge.

Related Searches

Topics

Related Articles