Access to the full content is only available to members of institutions that have purchased access. If you belong to such an institution, please log in or find out more about how to order.


Print

Contents

Free logics

DOI
10.4324/9780415249126-Y048-1
DOI: 10.4324/9780415249126-Y048-1
Version: v1,  Published online: 1998
Retrieved December 07, 2019, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/free-logics/v-1

Article Summary

We often need to reason about things that do not – or may not – exist. We might, for example, want to prove that there is no highest prime number by assuming its existence and deriving a contradiction. Our ordinary formal logic, however (that is, anything including standard quantification theory), automatically assumes that every singular term used has a denotation: if you can use the term ‘God’ – if that term is part of your language – automatically there is a denotation for it, that is, God exists. Some logicians have thought that this assumption prejudges too many important issues, and that it is best to get rid of it. So they have constructed logics free of this assumption, called ‘free logics’.

Print
Citing this article:
Bencivenga, Ermanno. Free logics, 1998, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-Y048-1. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/free-logics/v-1.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Routledge.

Related Searches

Topics

Related Articles