Print

Happiness

DOI
10.4324/9780415249126-L033-1
Versions
DOI: 10.4324/9780415249126-L033-1
Version: v1,  Published online: 1998
Retrieved April 24, 2024, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/happiness/v-1

References and further reading

  • Annas, J. (1993) The Morality of Happiness, New York: Oxford University Press.

    (A history of ancient ethics, focused on the notions of virtue and happiness, from Aristotle onwards.)

  • Aristotle (c. mid 4th century) Nicomachean Ethics, trans. with notes by T. Irwin, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1985, bks I, X.

    (Contains the core of his account of happiness.)

  • Austin, J. (1968) ‘Pleasure and Happiness’, Philosophy 43.

    (Examines the distinction.)

  • Bentham, J. (1789) An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, ed. J.H. Burns and H.L.A. Hart, revised F. Rosen, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.

    (Classic expression of the view that happiness consists in pleasure.)

  • Brandt, R.B. (1979) A Theory of the Good and the Right, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    (Argues that rational persons would choose a utilitarian moral code, and provides important discussions of such issues as happiness, welfare and desire-satisfaction.)

  • Crisp, R. (1997) Mill on Utilitarianism, London: Routledge, chaps 2–3.

    (Discusses Mill’s view of happiness.)

  • Den Uyl, D. and Machan, T.R. (1983) ‘Recent Work on the Concept of Happiness’, American Philosophical Quarterly 20.

    (A survey of contemporary discussions.)

  • Glover, J. (1990) Utilitarianism and its Critics, New York: Macmillan, pt II.

    (Good selection of writings on happiness, with special relevance to utilitarianism.)

  • Griffin, J. (1986) Well-Being, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pt I.

    (Examines different accounts of wellbeing in modern ethics.)

  • Hobbes, T. (1651) Leviathan, ed. C.B. Macpherson, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1968.

    (Can be interpreted as arguing that virtue and happiness are in opposition.)

  • Kraut, R. (1979) ‘Two Conceptions of Happiness’, Philosophical Review 80.

    (Explores the similarities and differences in two conceptions of happiness, Aristotle’s and our own.)

  • Mill, J.S. (1861) Utilitarianism, ed. R. Crisp, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998, ch. 2.

    (Argues that happiness consists in both higher and lower pleasures.)

  • Parfit, D. (1984) Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Clarendon Press, appendix I.

    (Identifies different positions about what makes someone’s life go well.)

  • Plato (c.380–367) Republic, trans. G.M. Grube, revised by C. Reeve, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1992.

    (Famous ancient argument for the identification of virtue and happiness.)

  • Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    (In the course of developing a non-utilitarian theory of justice, presents important criticisms of utilitarianism.)

  • Sidgwick, H. (1874) The Methods of Ethics, London: Macmillan; 7th edn, 1907.

    (The fullest and most closely argued version of classical utilitarianism.)

  • Sumner, L.W. (1996) Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    (Rejects hedonism and desire accounts, and defends a close connection of wellbeing to happiness.)

Print
Citing this article:
Griffin, J.P.. Bibliography. Happiness, 1998, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-L033-1. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/happiness/v-1/bibliography/happiness-bib.
Copyright © 1998-2024 Routledge.