Access to the full content is only available to members of institutions that have purchased access. If you belong to such an institution, please log in or find out more about how to order.


Print
REVISED
|

Nature, aesthetic appreciation of

DOI
10.4324/9780415249126-M032-2
Versions
Published
2010
DOI: 10.4324/9780415249126-M032-2
Version: v2,  Published online: 2010
Retrieved December 12, 2018, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/nature-aesthetic-appreciation-of/v-2

Article Summary

In the Western world, aesthetic appreciation of nature and its philosophical investigation came to maturity in the eighteenth century. During that time, aestheticians found in nature an ideal object of aesthetic experience and analysed that experience in terms of disinterestedness, thereby laying the groundwork for understanding the appreciation of nature in terms of the concepts of the sublime and the picturesque. This philosophical tradition culminated with Kant, while popular aesthetic appreciation of nature continued primarily under the influence of the idea of the picturesque.

In the late twentieth century, renewed interest in the aesthetics of nature has produced various positions designed to avoid assimilating appreciation of nature to traditional models for aesthetic appreciation of art. One extreme position holds that the appreciation of nature is not in fact aesthetic, while another rejects the traditional analysis of aesthetic experience as disinterested, arguing instead that the aesthetic appreciation of nature involves engagement with nature. Other positions attempt to maintain much of the traditional conception of the aesthetic, while distinguishing aesthetic appreciation of nature from that of art by appeal to the unique character of the object of appreciation, stressing dimensions such as nature’s capacity for emotional arousal, its mysterious qualities, the role of imagination in its appreciation, the freedom that its appreciation allows, or the dependence of its appreciation on scientific knowledge.

These positions have a number of ramifications. In freeing the aesthetic experience of nature from artistic models, they focus appreciation on the true character of the object of appreciation: nature itself and its properties. This significance given to the character of the object of appreciation secures connections with the appreciation of nature associated with environmentalism. In addition, some of these positions attempt to provide aesthetic appreciation of nature with a degree of objectivity that may make aesthetic considerations more effective in environmental assessment. Moreover, the contemporary work in the aesthetics of nature helps to pave the way for a general environmental aesthetics comparable to other areas of philosophy, such as environmental ethics.

Print
Citing this article:
Carlson, Allen. Nature, aesthetic appreciation of, 2010, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-M032-2. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/nature-aesthetic-appreciation-of/v-2.
Copyright © 1998-2018 Routledge.

Related Searches

Topics

Related Articles