Cite
Print

Contents

Thematic

Neo-Kantianism, Russian

DOI
10.4324/9780415249126-E064-1
DOI: 10.4324/9780415249126-E064-1
Version: v1,  Published online: 1998
Retrieved July 27, 2024, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/neo-kantianism-russian/v-1

List of works

  • Berdiaev, N. (1900) ’F.A. Lange i kriticheskaia filosofiia’ (’F.A. Lange and Critical Philosophy’), in Mir bozhii (1900) July: 224–254.

    (Reveals a side to his thought far different from his later ‘existentialist’ turn.)

  • Chelpanov, G. (1896–1904) Problema vospriiatiia prostranstva v sviazi s ucheniem ob apriornosti i vrozhdënnosti (The Problem of the Perception of Space in Connection with Theories of Apriority and Innateness), Kiev: Kushnerov, 2 vols.

    (Of his numerous works his most scholarly.)

  • Chelpanov, G. (1905) Vvedenie v filosofiiu (Introduction to Philosophy), 6th edn, Moscow: V.V. Dumnov, 1916.

    (Admirably clear and simple prose.)

  • Hessen, S. (1909) Individuelle Kausalität. Studien zum transzendentalen Empirismus (Individual Causality. Studies in Transcendental Empiricism), Berlin: Reuther & Reichard.

    (A treatment of an issue central to the Baden School of Neo-Kantianism.)

  • Kistiakovskii, B. (1899) Gesellschaft und Einzelwesen. Eine methodologische Untersuchung (Society and the Individual. A Methodological Investigation), Berlin: Verlag Otto Liebmann.

    (A Neo-Kantian examination of the foundations of sociology that paralleled much of Weber’s methodological work.)

  • Kistiakovskii, B. (1916) Sotsial’nye nauki i pravo (Social Sciences and the Law), Moscow.

    (A general theory of law from the standpoint of sociology.)

  • Lappo-Danilevskii, A. (1910–13) Metodologiia istorii (The Methodology of History), St Petersburg, 2 vols.

    (A monumental study by a distinguished historian.)

  • Lapshin, I. (1906) Zakony myshleniia i formy poznaniia (Laws of Thinking and Forms of Cognition), St Petersburg.

    (Despite its frequent departure from academic style this is his basic work.)

  • Lapshin, I. (1924) ’Oproverzhenie solipsizma’ (’A Refutation of Solipsism’), repr. in Filosofskie nauki (1992) 3: 18–45.

    (A valiant though vain attempt to overcome the limitations of his own essentially methodological solipsistic stance.)

  • Novgorodtsev, P. (1901) Kant i Gegel’ v ikh ucheniiakh o prave i gosudarstve (Kant and Hegel on Law and the State), Moscow: Moscow University.

    (Far more than simply an examination of Kant and Hegel.)

  • Novgorodtsev, P. (1909) Krizis sovremennogo pravosoznaniia (The Crisis of Contemporary Legal Consciousness), Moscow: Moscow University.

    (The major statement of his fully developed position.)

  • Savalskii, V. (1908) Osnovy filosofii prava v nauchnom idealizme (Foundations of the Philosophy of Law in Scientific Idealism), Moscow: Moscow University.

    (Highly polemical.)

  • Sezeman, V. (1911) ’Ratsional’noe i irratsional’noe v sisteme filosofii’ (’The Rational and the Irrational in a Philosophical System’), in Logos 2: 93–122.

    (An early generally mediocre essay.)

  • Shpet, G. (1907) Problema prichinnosti u Iuma i Kanta, (The Problem of Causality in Hume and Kant), Kiev: St Vladimir University.

    (Unfortunately Shpet states his own position only at the very end.)

  • Veideman, A. (1927) Myshlenie i bytie (Thinking and Being), Riga.

    (An almost unknown, albeit sketchy, amalgam of Neo-Kantianism with elements of Hegelianism.)

  • Volynskii, A. (1889) ’Kriticheskie i dogmaticheskie ėlementy v filosofii Kanta’ (’Critical and Dogmatic Elements in Kant’s Philosophy’), in Severnyi vestnik, (1889) 7: 67–87; 9: 61–83; 10: 89–109; 11: 51–72; 12: 55–78.

    (Surprising support for Kant from an unexpected corner.)

  • Vvedenskii, A. (1901) Filosofskie ocherki (Philosophical Essays), 2nd edn, Prague, 1924.

    (Contains a number of valuable pieces illuminating his general philosophical outlook.)

  • Vvedenskii, A. (1909) Logika, kak chast’ teorii poznaniia (Logic as a Part of a Theory of Cognition), 3rd edn, St Petersburg: Stasjulevich, 1917.

    (His basic text on epistemology.)

References and further reading

  • Putnam, G. (1977) Russian Alternatives to Marxism, Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.

    (Useful and very readable discussion of Novgorodtsev.)

  • Vucinich, A. (1976) Social Thought in Tsarist Russia, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 106–152.

    (Incisive and highly informative particularly on Kistiakovskii.)

  • Walicki, A. (1987) Legal Philosophies of Russian Liberalism, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 291–465.

    (Exciting and learned discussion of Novgorodtsev, Kistiakovskii and Hessen.)

  • Zenkovsky, V.V. (1948–50) Istoriia russkoi filosofii, vol. 2, Paris: YMCA-Press; 2nd edn 1989; trans. G.L. Kline, A History of Russian Philosophy, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul and New York: Columbia University Press, 1953, vol. 667–705.

    (Despite its age this remains the best secondary source.)

Cite
Print
Citing this article:
Nemeth, Thomas. Bibliography. Neo-Kantianism, Russian, 1998, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-E064-1. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/neo-kantianism-russian/v-1/bibliography/neo-kantianism-russian-bib.
Copyright © 1998-2024 Routledge.

Related Searches

Regions