Print
DOI
10.4324/9780415249126-V029-1
Versions
DOI: 10.4324/9780415249126-V029-1
Version: v1,  Published online: 1998
Retrieved April 26, 2024, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/qualia/v-1

References and further reading

  • Block, N. (1978) ‘‘Troubles with Functionalism’, repr. in D. Rosenthal (ed.) The Nature of Mind, New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.

    (Describes and raises objections to functionalism; home of the ‘absent qualia’ objection.)

  • Dennett, D. (1991) Consciousness Explained, Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

    (Argues for eliminativism about qualia, and challenges the view that there is a unified stream of consciousness.)

  • Hill, C. (1991) Sensations: A Defense of Type Materialism, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    (Argues for a type-identity thesis for sensations.)

  • Jackson, F. (1982) ‘‘Epiphenomenal Qualia’, repr. in W.G. Lycan, Mind and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1990.

    (Develops a version of the knowledge argument against a physicalistic reduction of qualia; see §2.)

  • Kripke, S. (1970) from ‘Naming and Necessity’, repr. in D. Rosenthal (ed.) The Nature of Minds, New York: Oxford University Press.

    (Presents the neo-Cartesian argument against a physicalist reduction of qualia mentioned in §2.)

  • Levin, J. (1991) ‘Analytic Functionalism and the Reduction of Phenomenal States’, in Philosophical Studies 61: 211–38.

    (Expands on the material in §2.)

  • Levine, J. (1983) ‘Materialism and Qualia: The Explanatory Gap’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64: 4.

    (Introduces the explanatory gap argument, discussed in §2.)

  • Lewis, D. (1972) ‘‘Psychophysical and Theoretical Identifications’, repr. in D. Rosenthal (ed.) The Nature of Minds, New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.

    (Argues for the equivalence of qualitative and functional concepts; see §2.)

  • Lewis, D. (1988) ‘‘What Experience Teaches’, repr. in W.G. Lycan, Mind and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    (Develops the view that what is gained by having new experiences are new abilities rather than knowledge of facts; see §2.)

  • Loar, B. (1990) ‘‘Phenomenal States’, in J. Tomberlin (ed.) Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 4, Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.

    (Introduces and develops the view discussed in §2.)

  • Nagel, T. (1974) ‘‘What is it Like to Be a Bat?’, repr. in D. Rosenthal (ed.) The Nature of Mind, New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.

    (Develops a version of the knowledge argument against physicalism, discussed in §2.)

  • Rosenthal, D. (1991) The Nature of Mind, New York: Oxford University Press.

    (Anthology includes a number of articles in this list, and many others relevant to these issues.)

  • Searle, J. (1992) The Rediscovery of the Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    (Argues that intentional states must have qualitative character.)

  • Shoemaker, S. (1990) ‘‘First-Person Access’, in J. Tomberlin, (ed.) Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 4, Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.

    (Develops views about self-knowledge discussed in §3.)

Print
Citing this article:
Levin, Janet. Bibliography. Qualia, 1998, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-V029-1. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/qualia/v-1/bibliography/qualia-bib.
Copyright © 1998-2024 Routledge.

Related Searches

Topics

Related Articles