Access to the full content is only available to members of institutions that have purchased access. If you belong to such an institution, please log in or find out more about how to order.


Print

Contents

DOI
10.4324/9780415249126-L088-1
DOI: 10.4324/9780415249126-L088-1
Version: v1,  Published online: 1998
Retrieved October 22, 2017, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/risk/v-1

Article Summary

Every day persons face threats from natural disasters such as hurricanes and from technological hazards such as exposure to more than 60,000 different chemicals. The increase of pervasive, human-caused hazards raises a number of philosophical issues, most notably in the areas of ethics and epistemology. There are three main classes of ethical issue associated with risk. (1) Who should define risk, and how should it be defined? (2) Who should evaluate risk, and according to which rules? (3) What are the conditions under which it is ethically acceptable to impose societal risk? Societal risks (such as those from liquefied natural gas facilities) tend to be involuntarily imposed, whereas individual risks (such as those from dietary consumption of saturated fats) are more voluntarily chosen. This discussion addresses societal, rather than individual, risks because they involve less individual choice and hence more ethical controversy.

Print
Citing this article:
Shrader-Frechette, Kristin. Risk, 1998, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-L088-1. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/risk/v-1.
Copyright © 1998-2017 Routledge.

Related Searches

Topics

Related Articles