Access to the full content is only available to members of institutions that have purchased access. If you belong to such an institution, please log in or find out more about how to order.


Print

Contents

Self-control

DOI
10.4324/9780415249126-L089-1
DOI: 10.4324/9780415249126-L089-1
Version: v1,  Published online: 1998
Retrieved December 10, 2018, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/self-control/v-1

Article Summary

A human person or self possesses powers that can come into conflict. Reason may have to struggle to overcome contrary desire. Self-control may be characterized as the ability to regulate or resolve such conflict correctly. A well-ordered self has self-control; a disordered self lacks it. When an agent lacks self-control, inner conflict often results in the victory of evil over good. Philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle, and Kant have painted portraits of the disordered self. They are alike in portraying its actions as stemming from appetites or desires that are not properly ruled by some ‘higher part’ of the self. These philosophers have also proposed accounts of the well-ordered self. They are alike in depicting it as a self in which a part of the self connected with reason or wisdom governs a ‘lower part’ associated with appetites or desires.

Print
Citing this article:
Quinn, Philip L.. Self-control, 1998, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-L089-1. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/self-control/v-1.
Copyright © 1998-2018 Routledge.

Related Searches

Topics

Related Articles