Access to the full content is only available to members of institutions that have purchased access. If you belong to such an institution, please log in or find out more about how to order.


Print

Contents

Tradition and traditionalism

DOI
10.4324/9780415249126-S063-1
DOI: 10.4324/9780415249126-S063-1
Version: v1,  Published online: 1998
Retrieved March 27, 2019, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/tradition-and-traditionalism/v-1

Article Summary

Tradition is that body of practice and belief which is socially transmitted from the past. It is regarded as having authority in the present simply because it comes from the past, and encapsulates the wisdom and experience of the past. For some, the very idea of tradition is anathema. It is characteristic of modernity to reject the authority of the past in favour of the present deployment of reason, unencumbered by tradition or prejudice. While prior to the seventeenth century tradition was largely unquestioned as a source of insight, and in need of no defence, since the Enlightenment the notion of tradition has been defended by traditionalists such as Burke and, more recently, Hayek. Upon inspection, however, traditionalism, if not indefensibly irrational, turns out to be a demonstration of the overlooked rationality contained within traditions. Traditions often turn out upon inspection to be not so much irrational as subtle and flexible deployments of reason in particular spheres.

Print
Citing this article:
O’Hear, Anthony. Tradition and traditionalism, 1998, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-S063-1. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/tradition-and-traditionalism/v-1.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Routledge.

Related Searches

Topics

Related Articles