Access to the full content is only available to members of institutions that have purchased access. If you belong to such an institution, please log in or find out more about how to order.


Print

Contents

DOI
10.4324/9780415249126-G027-1
DOI: 10.4324/9780415249126-G027-1
Version: v1,  Published online: 1998
Retrieved September 16, 2019, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/you-wu/v-1

Article Summary

In the Western metaphysical tradition, ‘being’ has most generally been thought to denote either a common property of things or a container which relates things by placing them within its own structure. Metaphysical notions of being are generally associated with the concept of ground. By contrast, the Chinese existential verb you (being) overlaps with the sense of ‘having’ rather than the copula, and therefore you (to be) means ‘to be present’ or ‘to be around’ while wu (not to be) means ‘not to be present’ or ‘not to be around’. This means that wu does not indicate strict opposition or contradiction, but absence. Thus, the you–wu distinction suggests mere contrast in the sense of either the presence or absence of x, rather than an assertion of the existence or nonexistence of x.

Print
Citing this article:
Hall, David L. and Roger T. Ames. You–wu, 1998, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-G027-1. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/you-wu/v-1.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Routledge.

Related Searches

Topics

Regions

Related Articles