Access to the full content is only available to members of institutions that have purchased access. If you belong to such an institution, please log in or find out more about how to order.


Print

Contents

Animals and ethics

DOI
10.4324/9780415249126-L004-1
DOI: 10.4324/9780415249126-L004-1
Version: v1,  Published online: 1998
Retrieved October 24, 2017, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/animals-and-ethics/v-1

Article Summary

Does morality require that we respect the lives and interests of nonhuman animals? The traditional doctrine was that animals were made for human use, and so we may dispose of them as we please. It has been argued, however, that this is a mere ‘speciesist’ prejudice and that animals should be given more or less the same moral consideration as humans. If this is right, we may be morally required to be vegetarians; and it may turn out that laboratory research using animals, and many other such practices, are more problematic than has been realized.

Print
Citing this article:
Rachels, James. Animals and ethics, 1998, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-L004-1. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/animals-and-ethics/v-1.
Copyright © 1998-2017 Routledge.

Related Searches

Topics

Related Articles