Version: v1, Published online: 1998
Retrieved April 25, 2024, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/deontological-ethics/v-1
References and further reading
Dancy, J. (1993) Moral Reasons, Oxford: Blackwell, chaps 10–12. (
Darwall, S. (1986) ‘Agent-Centred Restrictions from the Inside Out’, Philosophical Studies 50: 291–319. (
Davis, N. (1993) ‘Contemporary Deontology’, in P. Singer (ed.) A Companion to Ethics, Oxford: Blackwell, 205–18. (
Fried, C. (1978) Right and Wrong, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (
Kant, I. (1785) Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, trans. with notes by H.J. Paton, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (originally The Moral Law), London: Hutchinson, 1948; repr. New York: Harper & Row, 1964.
(A classic work of moral philosophy, which defends absolute constraints. It has become fashionable to deny that Kant is a deontologist, but he certainly qualifies as a member of the tradition. Difficult but rewarding.)
Mc Naughton, D. and Rawling, P. (1991) ‘Agent-Relativity and the Doing-Happening Distinction’, Philosophical Studies 63: 167–85. (
Mc Naughton, D. (1996) ‘An Unconnected Heap of Duties?’, Philosophical Quarterly 46 (185): 433–47. (
Argues that deontology, in the form advocated by Ross, can offer a systematic account of our distinct duties.)
Nagel, T. (1986) The View from Nowhere, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ch. 9. (
Ross, W.D. (1930) The Right and the Good, Oxford: Clarendon Press, ch. 2. (
McNaughton, David and Piers Rawling. Bibliography. Deontological ethics, 1998, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-L015-1. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/deontological-ethics/v-1/bibliography/deontological-ethics-bib.
Copyright © 1998-2024 Routledge.