Print

Deontological ethics

DOI
10.4324/9780415249126-L015-1
Versions
DOI: 10.4324/9780415249126-L015-1
Version: v1,  Published online: 1998
Retrieved April 25, 2024, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/deontological-ethics/v-1

References and further reading

  • Dancy, J. (1993) Moral Reasons, Oxford: Blackwell, chaps 10–12. (

    A challenging and idiosyncratic defence of a broadly deontological moral theory.)

  • Darwall, S. (1986) ‘Agent-Centred Restrictions from the Inside Out’, Philosophical Studies 50: 291–319. (

    A lucid and stimulating attempt to defend the broadly Kantian project of showing that constraints can be justified if we start with the considerations that should weigh with a person of good character.)

  • Davis, N. (1993) ‘Contemporary Deontology’, in P. Singer (ed.) A Companion to Ethics, Oxford: Blackwell, 205–18. (

    An accessible discussion of deontologists of an absolutist stripe, such as Fried.)

  • Fried, C. (1978) Right and Wrong, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (

    A readable and vigorous defence of an absolutist deontology.)

  • Kant, I. (1785) Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, trans. with notes by H.J. Paton, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (originally The Moral Law), London: Hutchinson, 1948; repr. New York: Harper & Row, 1964.

    (A classic work of moral philosophy, which defends absolute constraints. It has become fashionable to deny that Kant is a deontologist, but he certainly qualifies as a member of the tradition. Difficult but rewarding.)

  • Mc Naughton, D. and Rawling, P. (1991) ‘Agent-Relativity and the Doing-Happening Distinction’, Philosophical Studies 63: 167–85. (

    An attempt to provide a satisfactory account of the distinction between the agent-neutral and the agent-relative using formal logic, and to address the relationship between this distinction and that between consequentialism and deontology.)

  • Mc Naughton, D. (1996) ‘An Unconnected Heap of Duties?’, Philosophical Quarterly 46 (185): 433–47. (

    Argues that deontology, in the form advocated by Ross, can offer a systematic account of our distinct duties.)

  • Nagel, T. (1986) The View from Nowhere, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ch. 9. (

    A fascinating attempt to find a place for constraints by appeal to the importance of the personal point of view.)

  • Ross, W.D. (1930) The Right and the Good, Oxford: Clarendon Press, ch. 2. (

    The finest modern systematic exposition of a moderate deontology.)

Print
Citing this article:
McNaughton, David and Piers Rawling. Bibliography. Deontological ethics, 1998, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-L015-1. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/deontological-ethics/v-1/bibliography/deontological-ethics-bib.
Copyright © 1998-2024 Routledge.

Related Searches

Topics

Related Articles